The Hospitality Newsletter
Today Monday, September 7, 2026

pms comparison

Mews vs StayNTouch

In short

Choose Mews if you run 30–300 rooms — independents and small groups. Choose StayNTouch if you run mid-size to large hotels, chains and resorts. Deployment: Cloud-native versus Cloud, mobile-first.

Mews StayNTouch
Best forBoutique and mid-scale independents that want automation and a deep integration marketplace rather than one bundled suite.Properties putting mobile check-in and a guest-facing front desk at the centre of the operation.
Property size30–300 rooms — independents and small groupsMid-size to large hotels, chains and resorts
DeploymentCloud-nativeCloud, mobile-first
Pricing modelPer-room subscription, quoted — no public list pricePer-room subscription — not published
Where it is strongestStrongest in Europe, expanding in North AmericaPrimarily North America
Known forAPI-first design and a large third-party app marketplaceMobile-first check-in and untethered front desk
Our coverage28 stories8 stories

The companies

Mews

Founded2012
FoundersMatt Welle and Richard Valtr
HeadquartersAmsterdam, Netherlands
OwnershipPrivate, venture-backed

By the numbers

Properties served (2026)15,000
Countries (2026)85
Total funding raised (2026)$811.6M
Valuation (Jan 2026)$2.5B
Visit Mews →

StayNTouch

Founded2012
FoundersJos Schaap
HeadquartersBethesda, Maryland
OwnershipOwned by MCR, the US hotel owner-operator

By the numbers

Sale price to MCR (2020)$46M
Visit StayNTouch →

Company timelines

Founding and ownership milestones on one axis. Each dot is an event described below.

Mewsfounded 2012StayNTouchfounded 201220122026

How each got here

Ownership and funding history — it shapes roadmap, support and pricing more than any feature list does.

Mews

  • 2012Founded by Matt Welle and Richard Valtr, building a cloud PMS at a time when the category was still overwhelmingly on-premise.
  • 2025Raises $75M led by Tiger Global.
  • Jan 2026Raises $300M Series D led by EQT Growth at a $2.5B valuation, taking total funding past $800M and pushing the company into double-unicorn territory.

StayNTouch

  • 2012Founded as a mobile-first alternative to desktop-bound front desk systems.
  • 2016Shiji Group invests, later moving to full ownership.
  • Mar 2020The US administration orders Shiji to divest StayNTouch on national security grounds.
  • Aug 2020MCR, then the fifth-largest US hotel owner-operator, buys the company for $46 million — putting a PMS under the ownership of a hotel operator rather than a software group.

What has happened lately

From our daily desk, rebuilt on every publish — funding, launches, contracts and leadership moves at each company.

Where they appear together

Stories naming both Mews and StayNTouch.

From our reporting on alternatives

Where our newsroom has already looked at switching options in this category.

Top Mews Alternatives and Competitors for 2026

This report ranks the top property management systems competing with Mews, providing data-driven recommendations based on hotel size and geographic region.

24 Jun 2026
Top Mews Alternatives and Competitors for 2026

A comprehensive guide to selecting the right Property Management System (PMS) by comparing Mews against competitors based on property size and region.

7 Jun 2026

Frequently asked

+What is the difference between Mews and StayNTouch?

Mews — Cloud-native, built for 30–300 rooms — independents and small groups, known for API-first design and a large third-party app marketplace. StayNTouch — Cloud, mobile-first, built for Mid-size to large hotels, chains and resorts, known for mobile-first check-in and untethered front desk.

+Which is better for a smaller property, Mews or StayNTouch?

Mews targets 30–300 rooms — independents and small groups. StayNTouch targets mid-size to large hotels, chains and resorts. Match the system to the property size before comparing features — it settles most of this decision on its own.

+How is Mews priced compared with StayNTouch?

Mews: Per-room subscription, quoted — no public list price. StayNTouch: Per-room subscription — not published. Neither publishes list pricing, so both quote per property — any figure quoted elsewhere is a sales quote, not a price list.

Sources for the comparison table