The Hospitality Newsletter
Today Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Original finance The Hospitality Newsletter Team · ·For: Revenue, Owner, GM, Marketing

Direct vs OTA Bookings: How Search Shifts and Creators Reshape Channels

Antitrust curbs on Google, creator storefronts, and new repeat-guest metrics are reshaping hotel commercial strategies.

The short answer

European search feature curbs on Google and new creator itineraries are complicating hotel distribution. At the same time, new retention figures show direct bookers deliver quadruple the return rates of OTA guests.

5.1%
return rate of direct booking hotel guests
Bookboost study of 2.2M European guests
1.3%
return rate of OTA booking hotel guests
Bookboost study of 2.2M European guests
61%
independent property bookings captured by OTAs
Phocuswright 2024
$400 billion
projected direct digital bookings globally
Skift Research forecast for 2030
Direct vs OTA Bookings: How Search Shifts and Creators Reshape Channels
Photo: Mikhail Nilov / Pexels

The short version

  • Google separated EU travel search into distinct aggregator and supplier boxes while removing live pricing and date filters for suppliers.
  • Bookboost reported direct bookers return at 5.1% compared to 1.3% for OTA guests across 2.2 million guest profiles.
  • Klook enabled 30,000 travel creators across 88 markets to package and sell complete multi-product itineraries.

Shifts in search regulation, creator commerce, and guest retention data are forcing commercial leaders to overhaul direct and indirect distribution. European antitrust rules have diminished Google search features for direct suppliers, social platforms are converting itineraries directly via third parties, and new data demonstrates direct guests return at nearly four times the rate of OTA bookers. [1] [2] [3]

Google has stripped several search features for European Union users to comply with the Digital Markets Act and avoid regulatory fines, Skift reported. [1] The search engine redesigned its European results page to display two distinct units for flights, hotels, and restaurants: one exclusively reserved for third-party aggregators and booking sites, and a separate unit for direct suppliers. [1] Google also restricted its supplier unit, removing the ability for European Union searchers to filter by travel dates, check live pricing, or use tags such as "budget" or "boutique" directly in search results. [1] Furthermore, a statement from Google shared on LinkedIn confirmed the company removed its vacation rentals unit from European search results pages as early as September 8, while keeping rental feeds active on Google Maps and google.com/hotels. [1]

laptop showing search engine results
Photo: cottonbro studio / Pexels

How are creator storefronts opening up new third-party channels?

Experiences platform Klook expanded its Kreator Shops feature to more than 30,000 creators across 88 markets, turning social recommendations into single, bookable storefronts, according to Skift. [2] Rather than relying on disparate affiliate links pointing to individual activities, creators can present cohesive itineraries spanning hotels, attractions, restaurants, transportation, and eSIMs. [2] "A trip is an entire itinerary, not a single product," Marcus Yong, Klook's vice president of global marketing, told Skift. [2] This development moves social media influencers past top-of-funnel brand awareness and establishes an intermediary shopfront where followers reserve full trips without visiting a hotel's proprietary website. [2]

smartphone travel influencer recording video
Photo: https://kaboompics.com/ / Pexels

What does recent data reveal about direct versus OTA guest retention?

Data published by eHotelier shows direct-acquired hotel guests return at a rate of 5.1%, compared to 1.3% for guests arriving via online travel agencies. [3] Conducted by Bookboost across 2.2 million guests at European hotel groups between 2024 and 2026, the study established that repeat booking disparities occur even across identical properties, rooms, and front desk teams. [3] While OTAs represented 65% of first-time stays in the dataset, their share dropped to 32% for repeat visits. [3] Conversely, direct bookings rose from 35% of initial stays to 68% of return stays. [3]

modern boutique hotel bedroom interior
Photo: Max Vakhtbovych / Pexels
MetricDirect BookingsOTA BookingsSource / Sample
Return rate5.1%1.3%Bookboost (2.2M guests, 2024–2026)
Share of first stays35%65%Bookboost (2.2M guests, 2024–2026)
Share of return stays68%32%Bookboost (2.2M guests, 2024–2026)
First-stay revenue€379€280Bookboost European mid-market sample
Revenue per booking$516$312SiteMinder 2025 Hotel Booking Trends
10+ stay lifetime value~€3,000~€985Bookboost (OTA sample: 121 guests)

Why do direct guests spend more per stay than indirect guests?

Direct guests generate higher baseline room spend and purchase more amenities during their stays, according to eHotelier. [3] Bookboost tracked direct guest first-stay revenue at €379 compared to €280 for OTA guests across mid-market European properties prior to commission deductions. [3] When factoring in an 18% OTA commission, net revenue on a €280 third-party booking falls to €230. [3] Supporting this pattern, SiteMinder’s 2025 Hotel Booking Trends report determined hotel websites generate $516 per booking via channel managers versus $312 for OTAs. [3] Over a guest lifecycle of 10 or more visits, Bookboost found direct guests produce around €3,000 in cumulative revenue compared to roughly €985 for OTA guests, though only 121 OTA guests reached that stay threshold. [3]

How will macroeconomic channel shifts influence direct distribution goals?

Macro market studies project a shift toward direct digital platforms despite independent hotels remaining heavily exposed to OTAs. [3] HOTREC’s 2024 European Hotel Distribution Study documented direct channels generating 50.9% of European overnight stays in 2023, while OTAs captured approximately 30%. [3] However, Phocuswright reported that OTAs secured 61% of bookings for independent properties in 2024. [3] Looking ahead, Skift Research found over 80% of hoteliers expect direct guests to return at higher frequencies, and forecasts direct digital bookings will overtake OTA gross bookings globally by 2030, exceeding $400 billion compared to $333 billion for OTAs. [3]

Reported by

This article was written from the following reporting. Follow the links for the original coverage.

Frequently asked

+What features did Google strip from EU hotel search results?

Google removed live pricing checks, travel date filters, and descriptive tags like 'budget' or 'boutique' from its supplier units in the European Union to satisfy Digital Markets Act regulations. It also separated search into dedicated supplier and aggregator boxes.

+How does guest return rate compare between direct and OTA channels?

According to Bookboost data analyzing 2.2 million guests, direct bookers achieve a 5.1% return rate, whereas OTA bookers record a 1.3% return rate across the same properties and teams.

+What is Klook's Kreator Shops initiative?

Klook expanded Kreator Shops across 88 markets to 30,000 creators, enabling them to bundle full travel itineraries—including hotels, dining, and attractions—into a single storefront with an integrated booking link.

+How much more do direct guests spend on initial stays?

Bookboost reported European direct guests average €379 on first stays versus €280 for OTA guests. SiteMinder reported channel manager revenue per booking at $516 for hotel websites compared to $312 for OTAs.

+What market share do OTAs hold with independent properties?

Phocuswright found OTAs captured 61% of all bookings for independent properties in 2024, despite direct channels averaging 50.9% across all European overnight stays according to HOTREC.

+What is the global projection for direct digital hotel bookings by 2030?

Skift Research forecasts direct digital bookings will exceed $400 billion worldwide by 2030, surpassing OTA gross bookings projected at $333 billion.

Keep reading