B2B Hotel Distribution Shifts as OTA Volumes Squeeze Wholesale Margins
Booking Holdings overtakes Expedia in partner room nights while HBX Group battles margin erosion despite processing higher gross travel values.
The short answer
Booking Holdings has quietly overtaken Expedia in estimated annual B2B room nights. Meanwhile, independent bed bank leader HBX Group faces flat revenue and falling earnings despite adding over €1 billion in travel volume.
The short version
- Booking Holdings generated an estimated 196 million B2B room nights over 12 months, leading Expedia by roughly 15%.
- Expedia reported 23% growth in quarterly B2B revenue to $1.5 billion, significantly outpacing its consumer growth.
- HBX Group expects flat revenue and lower EBITDA despite processing over €1 billion in incremental travel volume.
Wholesale distribution is bifurcating as mega-online travel agencies capture massive partner volume while traditional bed banks face sharp take-rate compression. Booking Holdings now outpaces Expedia in estimated B2B room nights, while HBX Group expects higher total transaction value to produce flat revenue and lower adjusted EBITDA [[1], [2]].
Who controls the largest share of B2B room night volume?
Booking Holdings now leads the wholesale partner market in volume ahead of longtime leader Expedia, according to BTIG research reported by Skift [1]. Financial analyst Jake Fuller estimates that Booking Holdings booked roughly 196 million B2B room nights over a 12-month period [1]. That total puts Booking approximately 15% ahead of Expedia's partner business, which generated around 170 million room nights over the same timeline [1].

Expedia has historically positioned itself as the established frontrunner in supplying wholesale inventory to airlines, banks, and offline travel sellers [1]. Booking Holdings does not break out standalone financial figures for its partner segment, which previously led market observers to assume its enterprise channel remained small [1].
| Company / Intermediary | B2B Room Nights (LTM) | Recent Financial Metric | Market Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booking Holdings | 196 million (est.) | Undisclosed segment revenue | 15% volume lead over Expedia [1] |
| Expedia Group | 170 million (est.) | $1.5B Q2 B2B revenue (+23%) | Consumer unit grew 8% to $2.7B [1] |
| HBX Group (Hotelbeds) | Undisclosed | >€1B additional travel volume | Shares down ~33% from €11.50 IPO [2] |

Why are bed bank margins shrinking despite rising booking volume?
Bed banks face intense downward pressure on take rates even when gross booking volume expands, Skift reported regarding HBX Group [2]. HBX Group, the parent company of Hotelbeds and the world's largest independent hotel wholesaler, expects to process over €1 billion in additional travel on a constant-currency basis this year [2].
Yet that volume expansion will generate no incremental revenue and will yield less adjusted EBITDA than the previous year [2]. HBX confirmed to Skift that the primary deviation from its business model stems from severe take-rate compression across transactions [2].

How are public markets evaluating traditional wholesale models?
Equity investors have sharply marked down independent wholesalers as underlying margins deteriorate [2]. Shares of HBX Group have dropped by nearly one-third compared to their February 2025 initial public offering price of €11.50 [2].
While consumer-facing OTA conglomerates expand enterprise divisions rapidly—Expedia reported 23% growth in second-quarter B2B revenue to reach $1.5 billion—pure-play wholesalers struggle to turn transaction scale into operational profit [[1], [2]]. Expedia's consumer revenue grew at a slower 8% rate to $2.7 billion in the same quarter, underscoring how central B2B contracts have become to large platforms [1].
What do these shifts mean for hotel revenue management?
Hoteliers must evaluate whether third-party wholesale contracts yield profitable net revenue or simply dilute retail pricing power across corporate partner channels [[1], [2]]. With Booking Holdings and Expedia dominating enterprise distribution to financial institutions and global brands, independent bed banks must process larger gross volumes just to maintain static top-line numbers [[1], [2]]. Revenue leaders should monitor partner distribution paths closely to ensure room inventory is not leaking into discounted partner feeds without generating sufficient yield [[1], [2]].
Reported by
This article was written from the following reporting. Follow the links for the original coverage.
Frequently asked
+How many B2B room nights does Booking Holdings generate?
BTIG analyst Jake Fuller estimates Booking Holdings generated roughly 196 million B2B room nights over a 12-month period, surpassing Expedia's partner volume by about 15%.
+How fast is Expedia's B2B division growing?
Expedia's B2B division increased revenue by 23% to $1.5 billion in the second quarter, outpacing its retail consumer division, which grew 8% to $2.7 billion.
+Why is HBX Group experiencing flat revenue despite higher gross bookings?
HBX Group attributes flat revenue and declining adjusted EBITDA to unfavorable take-rate dynamics, even though it expects to process more than €1 billion in additional travel volume.
+What has happened to HBX Group's share price since its IPO?
Shares of HBX Group have dropped by nearly one-third from their February 2025 initial public offering price of €11.50 per share.
+Who are the primary buyers of B2B hotel inventory from OTAs?
Large online travel agencies sell wholesale hotel rooms, flights, and ancillary travel inventory to commercial partners such as banks, airlines, and offline travel agencies.
Keep reading
Our reporting
More in finance

